An employer of record (EOR) is a third-party organisation that employs workers on behalf of another company. Use an EOR when you need to hire an employee in a country or jurisdiction where your company does not have a suitable legal entity.

The EOR usually manages the employment contract, payroll, tax withholding, statutory benefits and employment administration. Your company manages the employee's daily work, including tasks, supervision and performance.

For a company hiring 1 employee abroad, testing a market or building a distributed team, an EOR can be faster than setting up a local entity. It is usually less suitable when you already have a mature local operation or need the lowest long-term cost per employee.

Last reviewed:

Employer of Record at a Glance

Question Answer
What is an EOR? A third-party organisation that employs workers on behalf of another company.
Why use one? To hire employees without immediately creating a local legal entity.
Who manages daily work? The client company usually manages tasks, performance and reporting lines.
Who handles payroll? The EOR usually processes payroll, taxes, benefits and required employment administration.
Is an EOR the same as a payroll provider? No. A payroll provider may process payments while the original employer retains legal responsibility.
Does an EOR remove every legal or tax risk? No. The client may still have employment, tax, data protection and permanent establishment obligations.
Who is an EOR best suited to? Companies hiring one or several employees, entering new markets, hiring remotely or recruiting under time pressure.

What Does an Employer of Record Do?

An EOR handles the formal employment tasks that would otherwise require your company to establish and maintain a local employing entity.

These tasks can include:

  • Preparing locally compliant employment contracts
  • Onboarding employees
  • Running payroll
  • Withholding and remitting employment taxes
  • Managing statutory benefits, leave and insurance
  • Maintaining employment records
  • Supporting employee changes and terminations
  • Providing local HR and employment guidance

The employee works for your company in practice, but the EOR is generally the contractual employer in the relevant jurisdiction. Your company normally decides what work the employee performs, how the work is supervised and how performance is assessed.

The exact division of responsibility depends on the country, employment contract and EOR agreement. In the United States, the Department of Labor recognises that two businesses can share employment responsibilities in some arrangements, including arrangements involving employment agencies.

Why Use an Employer of Record?

Companies use an EOR to hire employees in another jurisdiction without immediately creating a local employing entity. The main benefits are speed, local employment administration and a simpler way to manage small international teams.

1. Hire Employees Without Setting Up a Local Entity

The main reason to use an EOR is to employ people in a location where your company does not yet have an operating subsidiary or registered employer.

Creating a local entity can require:

  • Company registration
  • Local directors or representatives
  • Tax registrations
  • Payroll infrastructure
  • Bank accounts
  • Employment policies
  • Accounting and annual filings
  • Local legal and HR support

An EOR gives a company another option when it needs to hire before deciding whether a permanent local operation is justified.

2. Enter a New Market Faster

An EOR can reduce the administrative steps between selecting a candidate and issuing a compliant employment contract. This can help when:

  • A strong candidate is available immediately
  • A project has a fixed start date
  • The company needs local expertise before opening an office
  • The business wants to test demand in a new country
  • A remote employee relocates internationally

Speed is not the only consideration. The EOR still needs to confirm that it can legally employ the person, provide suitable benefits and support the role under local rules.

3. Reduce Local Payroll and Employment Administration

Employment administration becomes more complex when a company operates across multiple countries. Each location may have different requirements for:

  • Pay frequency
  • Income tax withholding
  • Social security contributions
  • Paid leave
  • Public holidays
  • Severance
  • Notice periods
  • Mandatory insurance
  • Employee benefits
  • Payroll reporting

The Internal Revenue Service states that employers that outsource payroll generally remain responsible for employment tax duties. Specific arrangements, such as certified professional employer organisations, can create different liability rules.

An EOR can manage much of this administration, but companies should confirm which tasks and liabilities the provider accepts. Using an EOR does not automatically transfer every obligation away from the client.

4. Employ Workers Instead of Misusing Contractor Arrangements

Some companies engage international workers as independent contractors because the arrangement appears simpler. That structure can create risk when the worker functions like a regular employee.

The IRS considers factors such as the working relationship, permanency, employee benefits and the company's right to direct the work. The label in the contract does not determine worker status by itself.

An EOR may be a better structure when the worker:

  • Works continuously for one company
  • Performs a core business function
  • Follows the company's schedule or processes
  • Receives regular supervision
  • Is integrated into the company's team
  • Expects employee benefits or paid leave

An EOR does not make every engagement compliant. The role, working arrangement and local law still need to be assessed.

5. Provide Locally Compliant Employment Terms and Benefits

Employees generally expect a contract, payslips, leave rights and benefits that reflect local employment practices. An EOR can help a company provide these without building its own local HR operation.

Depending on the country and provider, the EOR may support:

  • Statutory pension or retirement contributions
  • Health insurance
  • Paid annual leave
  • Sick leave
  • Parental leave
  • Workers' compensation
  • Local payroll documentation
  • Employment certificates

Benefits vary by country. Compare the actual package rather than assuming that every EOR offers equivalent coverage.

6. Manage Hiring in Multiple Countries

A company with employees in several countries may prefer one EOR platform, invoice and HR process instead of managing separate payroll vendors and advisers in each location.

A central process can improve visibility over:

  • Total employment cost
  • Payroll deadlines
  • Employee start dates
  • Benefits
  • Leave balances
  • Contract terms
  • Compliance documents

One platform does not always mean one legal model. Some EOR providers employ workers through their own entities, while others rely on local partners. The provider should disclose which model applies in each country.

EOR Versus the Main Alternatives

Option Legal employer Best for Main advantage Main limitation
Employer of record EOR or its local employing entity Hiring employees where the company lacks an entity Faster market entry without immediate entity formation Ongoing per-employee fees and less direct control over local employment administration
Local legal entity Your company Large, permanent or strategic operations More control and potentially lower unit cost at scale Setup time, administration and ongoing compliance
Independent contractor The contractor is self-employed or operates through a business Genuine project-based or independent work Flexible engagement structure Misclassification and employment-law risk
Payroll provider Usually your company Companies that already have a local entity Outsourced payroll processing Does not usually replace the local employer or eliminate employer liability
PEO Shared or co-employment model, depending on the arrangement Businesses seeking HR and benefits support in an existing market Administrative support and potential access to group benefits Usually requires a different legal and operational structure from an EOR

A payroll provider is not automatically an EOR. The IRS explains that companies outsourcing payroll may remain responsible for deposits, reporting and employment taxes if the third party fails to perform those duties.

When Should a Company Use an EOR?

An EOR is usually a strong option when several of these conditions apply:

  • You need to hire an employee in a country where you do not have an entity.
  • You are hiring one or a small number of employees.
  • You want to test a market before committing to a subsidiary.
  • You need to hire faster than an entity setup would allow.
  • You want employees rather than contractors.
  • You need local payroll, benefits and employment administration.
  • You expect the arrangement may be temporary or subject to change.
  • Your internal HR team lacks country-specific expertise.

For example, a United States software company hiring its first product manager in Germany may use an EOR to employ the person under a German-compliant contract while the company evaluates whether to establish a German subsidiary.

When Is an EOR Not the Best Option?

An EOR may not be the right long-term structure when the company already has local infrastructure, expects significant headcount growth or needs full control over employment terms.

You Already Have a Local Employing Entity

If your company already has a registered entity, bank account and payroll process, an EOR may add unnecessary fees and administrative layers. A local payroll provider or PEO may be more appropriate.

You Are Building a Large Permanent Team

An EOR's per-employee fee can become significant as headcount grows. A subsidiary may provide more control and a lower long-term cost per employee, although the comparison should include entity setup, accounting, legal, HR and compliance costs.

You Need Complete Control Over Employment Terms

The EOR may control or restrict the employment contract, benefits, payroll calendar, expense process and termination procedure. This matters in regulated industries or when the company needs customised employment policies.

The Worker Is Genuinely an Independent Contractor

An EOR is designed for employee relationships. If the worker is genuinely independent, controls how the work is performed and is engaged for a defined project, a compliant contractor arrangement may be more suitable.

Classification should be based on the actual relationship, not only the written agreement.

You Expect the EOR to Eliminate Corporate Tax Exposure

An EOR can manage local employment administration, but it does not automatically remove corporate tax, permanent establishment or local business activity risks.

The IRS notes that employees working in the United States on behalf of a foreign corporation can contribute to that corporation being considered engaged in a US trade or business. The result depends on the specific facts and activities.

A company should obtain tax advice where the employee will sell to customers, negotiate or conclude contracts, manage local operations or perform core revenue-generating activities.

How Much Does an EOR Cost?

There is no universal EOR price. The total cost normally includes:

  1. Employee salary or wages
  2. Employer payroll taxes and statutory contributions
  3. Mandatory and selected benefits
  4. The EOR's management or service fee
  5. Possible one-time charges
  6. Currency conversion or payment costs
  7. Country-specific taxes or indirect charges
  8. Termination, immigration, background-check or other optional services

EOR invoices may separate salary, statutory contributions, benefits, management fees, incentives, expenses and one-time services.

When comparing an EOR with a local entity, do not compare only the monthly service fee. Compare the expected total cost over the period you expect to employ the worker. Include entity formation, accounting, payroll, legal support, benefits and closure costs.

What to Check Before Choosing an EOR

Before signing an agreement, ask each provider:

  • Does the provider employ workers through its own entity or a local partner?
  • In which countries and jurisdictions can it employ people directly?
  • What is included in the monthly fee?
  • Which benefits are mandatory, optional or excluded?
  • Are payroll taxes and employer contributions shown separately?
  • Are currency conversion fees included?
  • Who handles employee complaints and leave administration?
  • How are terminations managed?
  • Who bears responsibility for payroll errors?
  • What indemnities are included in the contract?
  • How are employee data, intellectual property and confidential information protected?
  • Can the provider support equity compensation?
  • What happens if the employee relocates?
  • What are the notice, refund and offboarding terms?

The most useful comparison is not the advertised fee alone. Review the provider's local coverage, contract terms, support model, pricing transparency and ability to manage difficult employment events.

Bottom Line: Why Use an Employer of Record?

An EOR makes sense when speed and local employment administration matter more than the lowest long-term cost per employee. It can support early international hiring, market testing and small distributed teams without requiring an immediate local entity.

Before choosing one, separate employment administration from broader tax and legal questions. Worker classification, permanent establishment, corporate tax, data protection and termination obligations may still require specialist advice. As headcount and local activity grow, a subsidiary may offer more control and better economics.